Spec-wise, it has a PC sync port, which is useful, USB tethering, which is vital, and a maximum shutter speed of 1/8,000 of a second, which has been extremely useful with certain clients. The

The 5D Mark IV comes in at around $2,500 (at the time of this writing), compared to around $4,999 for the 1D X Mark II. Pros and Cons of the 6D Mark II Compared to the 5D Mark IV. The 6D Mark II lacks a few of the features found in Canon’s high-end DSLRs.

This 5D Mark III has gotten fatter than the previous 5D Mark II (950 vs. 907g), while the Nikon D800 and D800E have gotten slimmer from the previous D700 (1,000 g vs. 1,085 g). The 5D Mark III now weighs only 1.8 ounces (50g) less than the D800, mostly eliminating the light-weight advantage of the Canon 5D series over Nikon's full-frame cameras. After a comparison of both, I decided that the 1D X Mark II still made the most sense for my needs, but the 5D Mark IV impressed me way more than I expected. 30.4 megapixels with fast processors seems to be a good balance between more resolution and details without the need to have a significant shutter speed multiplier like I needed on the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Canon EOS R Canon EF 100mm F2.8L Macro IS USM Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS II USM Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM +5 more Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread Complain ^{930 g. 2.05 lb. The Canon EOS 5D Mark IV takes the lead with a score of 75/100, while the Canon EOS 5DS trails with a score of 69/100. Both cameras are DSLRs released by Canon, with the 5D Mark IV being announced in 2016 and the 5DS in 2015. They share similar dimensions, but the 5D Mark IV is slightly lighter at 890g compared to the 5DS at 930g.} S7gatE.

669t5zrng5.pages.dev/164

669t5zrng5.pages.dev/330

669t5zrng5.pages.dev/225

669t5zrng5.pages.dev/145

669t5zrng5.pages.dev/313

669t5zrng5.pages.dev/322

669t5zrng5.pages.dev/262

669t5zrng5.pages.dev/225

669t5zrng5.pages.dev/254

canon 1d mark iv vs 5d mark ii